<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Milwaukie MAX Plan Adopted, Harold a &#8220;Future Station&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brooklyn-neighborhood.org/2008/06/26/milwaukie-max-plan-adopted-harold-a-future-station/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brooklyn-neighborhood.org/2008/06/26/milwaukie-max-plan-adopted-harold-a-future-station/</link>
	<description>Portland, Oregon</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:44:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sellwood Guy</title>
		<link>http://brooklyn-neighborhood.org/2008/06/26/milwaukie-max-plan-adopted-harold-a-future-station/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Sellwood Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brooklyn-neighborhood.org/?p=28#comment-63</guid>
		<description>The decision to eliminate the Harold Street Station due to cost concerns is outrageous.

After spending tens of thousands of dallars and countless hours in meetings to gauge public opinion, the bureacrats and bean counters stuck with their original plan.

This station had overwhelming support from the surrounding neighborhood and was endorsed by the Tr-Met Citizens advisory council, and the Sellwood (SMILE), Woodstock, and Brooklyn neighborhood Associations.

Each time that support surged, the Metro planners would come out with another inflated (and yet unsubstantiated) budget projection for the cost of the station and bridges.

The planners can&#039;t seem to explain why two proposed bridges for Harold, most recently quoted at $18 million, cost so much more than the three pedestrian bridges, crossing the same obstacles, at the Springwater Corridor only cost 4.7 million. 

http://www.oregonmetro.gov/index.cfm/go/by.web/id=17437

Unlike the majority of the other car focused &quot;park and ride&quot; stations, Harold Street is focused on pedestrian and bicycle access.  To truly compare the cost of this station with the others, we need to see the costs of parking structures and lots tied to the other stations.

The failure of the steering committee to acknowledge the public and community support for this station is not only an insult to our citizens vision, but a mockery of the so called collaborative planning process.

I am thoroughly disgusted with this outcome, and will remember the decisions our elected officials made when the next election comes around.  I would urge you all to do the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The decision to eliminate the Harold Street Station due to cost concerns is outrageous.</p>
<p>After spending tens of thousands of dallars and countless hours in meetings to gauge public opinion, the bureacrats and bean counters stuck with their original plan.</p>
<p>This station had overwhelming support from the surrounding neighborhood and was endorsed by the Tr-Met Citizens advisory council, and the Sellwood (SMILE), Woodstock, and Brooklyn neighborhood Associations.</p>
<p>Each time that support surged, the Metro planners would come out with another inflated (and yet unsubstantiated) budget projection for the cost of the station and bridges.</p>
<p>The planners can&#8217;t seem to explain why two proposed bridges for Harold, most recently quoted at $18 million, cost so much more than the three pedestrian bridges, crossing the same obstacles, at the Springwater Corridor only cost 4.7 million. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.oregonmetro.gov/index.cfm/go/by.web/id=17437" rel="nofollow">http://www.oregonmetro.gov/index.cfm/go/by.web/id=17437</a></p>
<p>Unlike the majority of the other car focused &#8220;park and ride&#8221; stations, Harold Street is focused on pedestrian and bicycle access.  To truly compare the cost of this station with the others, we need to see the costs of parking structures and lots tied to the other stations.</p>
<p>The failure of the steering committee to acknowledge the public and community support for this station is not only an insult to our citizens vision, but a mockery of the so called collaborative planning process.</p>
<p>I am thoroughly disgusted with this outcome, and will remember the decisions our elected officials made when the next election comes around.  I would urge you all to do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://brooklyn-neighborhood.org/2008/06/26/milwaukie-max-plan-adopted-harold-a-future-station/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brooklyn-neighborhood.org/?p=28#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Here are the reasons why the other stations planned for Milwaukie were dropped:

1. Bluebird:  Low ridership, and limited commercial development opportuniites.  The station would have to be elevated and would therefore be expensive and would have serious ecurity challenges.

2. Washington and Monroe Streets: Would have required stations to be either on or next to the private Portland Waldorf School and St. John&#039;s Catholic School.  Both schools were opposed to having a station on their campuses.

3.  Harrison: Station would have been too far from Main Street and would have also been located on the Waldorf School campus.

4. Southgate Theatre Site: Trimet recently abandonded plans to relocate the Milwaukie Transit Center here.  Construction costs would have been much higher due to several large industrial businesses that would have been displaced.  Road impacts would have been greater due to the need to realign Main Street.  Serious impacts would have occured at the historic ODOT office building as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are the reasons why the other stations planned for Milwaukie were dropped:</p>
<p>1. Bluebird:  Low ridership, and limited commercial development opportuniites.  The station would have to be elevated and would therefore be expensive and would have serious ecurity challenges.</p>
<p>2. Washington and Monroe Streets: Would have required stations to be either on or next to the private Portland Waldorf School and St. John&#8217;s Catholic School.  Both schools were opposed to having a station on their campuses.</p>
<p>3.  Harrison: Station would have been too far from Main Street and would have also been located on the Waldorf School campus.</p>
<p>4. Southgate Theatre Site: Trimet recently abandonded plans to relocate the Milwaukie Transit Center here.  Construction costs would have been much higher due to several large industrial businesses that would have been displaced.  Road impacts would have been greater due to the need to realign Main Street.  Serious impacts would have occured at the historic ODOT office building as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://brooklyn-neighborhood.org/2008/06/26/milwaukie-max-plan-adopted-harold-a-future-station/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 03:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brooklyn-neighborhood.org/?p=28#comment-56</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised that Milwaukie is only getting one station.  I&#039;m looking forward to hearing the official explanation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised that Milwaukie is only getting one station.  I&#8217;m looking forward to hearing the official explanation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
